| Russian 
(PDF)
 
 IMF Says European Economic Recovery to be 
Fragile and Calls for Policy Action to Secure a Solid ReboundPress Release No. 09/332October 3, 2009
 The current European economic recession is showing signs of bottoming out, 
but the recovery is likely to be slow and fragile, the International Monetary 
Fund (IMF) said today in its October 2009 Regional Economic Outlook (REO) for 
Europe. Helped by rebounding confidence and a tentative pick up in global trade, 
the contraction in Europe appears to have ended at mid-2009 and is expected to 
give way to a moderate recovery in 2010 and more solid growth returning only 
afterwards, the report said. “The long recession shows signs of finally bottoming out. But the recovery 
will likely be slow and fragile because the pickup in demand from Asia can 
hardly substitute for the pre-crisis appetite for imports of U.S. consumers. 
Europe cannot count on exports alone to drive the recovery. In addition, credit 
remains scarce, unemployment is rising, and the crisis has reduced Europe’s 
growth potential,” said Marek Belka, Director of the IMF’s European Department. 
In advanced economies this should result in an average decline of -4.0 percent 
in 2009 and growth of 0.5 percent in 2010. In emerging Europe activity is 
expected to contract by -6.6 percent this year, but growth should return to most 
countries in 2010, with GDP increasing by an average 1.7 percent. The report calls on policymakers to focus their attention on securing the 
recovery. In the near term, they should adopt a more resolute approach to 
assessing the balance sheet risks faced by banks, and take action to 
recapitalize or restructure viable institutions and resolve others. “The 
economic recovery might be weaker than hoped for unless the financial sector 
problems are dealt with promptly and effectively,” Belka said. Macroeconomic policies also need to sustain the upswing while preparing for 
an exit. The fragility of the recovery will require fiscal policy to continue 
with planned stimuli and letting automatic stabilizers work, but sustainability 
concerns demand a strong consolidation effort once the recovery has firmed up. 
And monetary policy will need to remain supportive but, once financial 
conditions normalize and the recovery is firm, attention needs to be given to 
exiting the unprecedented market interventions forced by the crisis. Clear 
communication of this exit strategy will be essential, the report says. “There 
is little rest for the weary. The fragility of the upswing will require 
policymakers’ steady hand to maintain support for activity while preparing to 
exit from the policies put into place during the crisis. Getting its timing and 
the pace right will require careful judgment,” Belka stated. “But, overall, moving fast to repair the damage the crisis has caused to 
potential growth is what ultimately matters most. Only lifting the long-run 
growth potential of Europe will put the crisis behind us for good,” he added. To 
achieve this, policymakers in advanced countries should pursue opportunities to 
reform labor and product markets, while those in emerging economies should focus 
on developing a new business model that rebalances the sources of growth and 
financing. Brief Summary of the Analytic Chapters in the 
2009 October REOChapter 2 of the 2009 October REO, entitled “The Crisis 
and Potential Output,” looks at the impact of the crisis on Europe’s 
potential growth and concludes that financial sector difficulties, weak 
investment, and long spells of unemployment are likely to hold back potential 
growth over the next few years. The magnitude of their impact is, however, 
uncertain. Over the long term, potential growth should return to its historic 
trend in most of Europe’s advanced economies, except where unsustainable 
financial sector profits might have exaggerated growth. In emerging Europe, 
resuming convergence will depend on restoring sustainable capital inflows by 
ensuring a business-friendly environment, strengthening policy frameworks to 
reduce uncertainty, and implementing sound macroeconomic policies. Chapter 3 of the REO, entitled “Implications of the Fall 
in Potential Output for Macroeconomic Policies,” concludes that the decline 
in potential output and the surrounding uncertainty complicates both fiscal and 
monetary policy decisions in an already difficult environment and can lead to 
policy mistakes. To keep inflation expectations anchored, monetary policymakers 
will need to clearly communicate their views on potential output on which policy 
rate decisions are based, while emphasizing their commitment to adjust as new 
information arrives. Given the large fiscal costs of the crisis, fiscal policy 
should err on the side of caution and consolidate as soon as the recovery takes 
momentum. Chapter 4 of the REO, entitled “Policies in Emerging 
Economies to Cope with Heightened Risk during Recovery,” says that emerging 
Europe is likely to face higher risk premiums and a more volatile environment in 
the aftermath of the financial crisis, as investors pay increased attention to 
domestic policies in individual countries. Adopting policies that lower 
uncertainty about the state of the financial system and reduce fiscal discretion 
would go a long way in addressing concerns and will yield a “double dividend” in 
improving prospects for long-term growth. 
	
	
		
			| 
				
				Table 1. European Countries: Real GDP 
				Growth and CPI Inflation, 2006–10(Percent)
 
					
						
							|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
							|  |  
							|  | Real GDP Growth |  | CPI Inflation |  
							|  | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |  | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |  
							|  |  
							| Europe 
							1/ 2/ | 4.2 | 3.9 | 1.7 | -4.7 | 0.8 |  | 3.6 | 3.6 | 5.7 | 3.0 | 2.7 |  
							| Advanced 
							European economies 1/ | 3.2 | 2.8 | 0.8 | -4.0 | 0.5 |  | 2.2 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 1.0 |  
							| Emerging 
							European economies 1/ 2/ | 7.2 | 6.8 | 4.2 | -6.6 | 1.7 |  | 7.8 | 7.8 | 12.0 | 9.0 | 7.2 |  
							| European 
							Union 1/ | 3.4 | 3.1 | 1.0 | -4.2 | 0.5 |  | 2.3 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 1.1 |  
							| Euro 
							area | 2.9 | 2.7 | 0.7 | -4.2 | 0.3 |  | 2.2 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 |  
							| Austria | 3.5 | 3.5 | 2.0 | -3.8 | 0.3 |  | 1.7 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 |  
							| Belgium | 3.0 | 2.6 | 1.0 | -3.2 | 0.0 |  | 2.3 | 1.8 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 |  
							| Cyprus | 4.1 | 4.4 | 3.6 | -0.5 | 0.8 |  | 2.2 | 2.2 | 4.4 | 0.4 | 1.2 |  
							| Finland | 4.9 | 4.2 | 1.0 | -6.4 | 0.9 |  | 1.3 | 1.6 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 |  
							| France | 2.4 | 2.3 | 0.3 | -2.4 | 0.9 |  | 1.9 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 1.1 |  
							| Germany | 3.2 | 2.5 | 1.2 | -5.3 | 0.3 |  | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 |  
							| Greece | 4.5 | 4.0 | 2.9 | -0.8 | -0.1 |  | 3.3 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 1.7 |  
							| Ireland | 5.4 | 6.0 | -3.0 | -7.5 | -2.5 |  | 2.7 | 2.9 | 3.1 | -1.6 | -0.3 |  
							| Italy | 2.0 | 1.6 | -1.0 | -5.1 | 0.2 |  | 2.2 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 |  
							| Luxembourg | 6.4 | 5.2 | 0.7 | -4.8 | -0.2 |  | 2.7 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 0.2 | 1.8 |  
							| Malta | 3.8 | 3.7 | 2.1 | -2.1 | 0.5 |  | 2.6 | 0.7 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 1.9 |  
							| Netherlands | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.0 | -4.2 | 0.7 |  | 1.7 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 |  
							| Portugal | 1.4 | 1.9 | 0.0 | -3.0 | 0.4 |  | 3.0 | 2.4 | 2.7 | -0.6 | 1.0 |  
							| Slovak 
							Republic | 8.5 | 10.4 | 6.4 | -4.7 | 3.7 |  | 4.5 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 2.3 |  
							| Slovenia | 5.9 | 6.8 | 3.5 | -4.7 | 0.6 |  | 2.5 | 3.6 | 5.7 | 0.5 | 1.5 |  
							| Spain | 4.0 | 3.6 | 0.9 | -3.8 | -0.7 |  | 3.6 | 2.8 | 4.1 | -0.3 | 0.9 |  
							| Other EU 
							advanced economies |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
							| Denmark | 3.3 | 1.6 | -1.2 | -2.4 | 0.9 |  | 1.9 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 2.0 |  
							| Sweden | 4.2 | 2.6 | -0.2 | -4.8 | 1.2 |  | 1.5 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 2.4 |  
							| United 
							Kingdom | 2.9 | 2.6 | 0.7 | -4.4 | 0.9 |  | 2.3 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 1.5 |  
							| New EU 
							countries 1/ | 6.6 | 6.0 | 4.0 | -4.3 | 0.7 |  | 3.2 | 4.3 | 6.5 | 3.4 | 2.2 |  
							| Bulgaria | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.0 | -6.5 | -2.5 |  | 7.4 | 7.6 | 12.0 | 2.7 | 1.6 |  
							| Czech 
							Republic | 6.8 | 6.1 | 2.7 | -4.3 | 1.3 |  | 2.5 | 2.9 | 6.3 | 1.0 | 1.1 |  
							| Estonia | 10.0 | 7.2 | -3.6 | -14.0 | -2.6 |  | 4.4 | 6.6 | 10.4 | 0.0 | -0.2 |  
							| Hungary | 3.9 | 1.2 | 0.6 | -6.7 | -0.9 |  | 3.9 | 7.9 | 6.1 | 4.5 | 4.1 |  
							| Latvia | 12.2 | 10.0 | -4.6 | -18.0 | -4.0 |  | 6.6 | 10.1 | 15.3 | 3.1 | -3.5 |  
							| Lithuania | 7.8 | 8.9 | 3.0 | -18.5 | -4.0 |  | 3.8 | 5.8 | 11.1 | 3.5 | -2.9 |  
							| Poland | 6.2 | 6.8 | 4.9 | 1.0 | 2.2 |  | 1.0 | 2.5 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 2.6 |  
							| Romania | 7.9 | 6.2 | 7.1 | -8.5 | 0.5 |  | 6.6 | 4.8 | 7.8 | 5.5 | 3.6 |  
							| Non-EU 
							advanced economies |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
							| Iceland | 4.3 | 5.6 | 1.3 | -8.5 | -2.0 |  | 6.8 | 5.0 | 12.4 | 11.7 | 4.4 |  
							| Israel | 5.3 | 5.2 | 4.0 | -0.1 | 2.4 |  | 2.1 | 0.5 | 4.6 | 3.6 | 2.0 |  
							| Norway | 2.3 | 3.1 | 2.1 | -1.9 | 1.3 |  | 2.3 | 0.7 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 |  
							| Switzerland | 3.6 | 3.6 | 1.8 | -2.0 | 0.5 |  | 1.0 | 0.7 | 2.4 | -0.4 | 0.5 |  
							| Other 
							emerging economies |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
							| Albania | 5.5 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 0.7 | 2.2 |  | 2.4 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 2.0 |  
							| Belarus | 10.0 | 8.6 | 10.0 | -1.2 | 1.8 |  | 7.0 | 8.4 | 14.8 | 13.0 | 8.3 |  
							| Bosnia 
							and Herzegovina | 6.9 | 6.8 | 5.5 | -3.0 | 0.5 |  | 6.1 | 1.5 | 7.4 | 0.9 | 1.6 |  
							| Croatia | 4.7 | 5.5 | 2.4 | -5.2 | 0.4 |  | 3.2 | 2.9 | 6.1 | 2.8 | 2.8 |  
							| Macedonia, FYR | 4.0 | 5.9 | 4.9 | -2.5 | 2.0 |  | 3.2 | 2.3 | 8.3 | -0.5 | 2.0 |  
							| Moldova | 4.8 | 3.0 | 7.2 | -9.0 | 0.0 |  | 12.7 | 12.4 | 12.7 | 1.4 | 7.7 |  
							| Montenegro | 8.6 | 10.7 | 7.5 | -4.0 | -2.0 |  | 2.1 | 3.5 | 9.0 | 3.4 | 2.1 |  
							| Russia | 7.7 | 8.1 | 5.6 | -7.5 | 1.5 |  | 9.7 | 9.0 | 14.1 | 12.3 | 9.9 |  
							| Serbia | 5.2 | 6.9 | 5.4 | -4.0 | 1.5 |  | 12.7 | 6.5 | 11.7 | 9.9 | 7.3 |  
							| Turkey | 6.9 | 4.7 | 0.9 | -6.5 | 3.7 |  | 9.6 | 8.8 | 10.4 | 6.2 | 6.8 |  
							| Ukraine | 7.3 | 7.9 | 2.1 | -14.0 | 2.7 |  | 9.1 | 12.8 | 25.2 | 16.3 | 10.3 |  
							|  |  
							| Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook. 1/ Average weighted by PPP GDP.
 2/ Montenegro is excluded from the 
							aggregate calculations.
 |  |    
 |