| 
 WASHINGTON, DC: The Executive 
Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV 
consultation 
with the Republic of Moldova on December 20, 2021. The Board 
also approved the authorities’ requests for arrangements under the Extended Fund 
Facility (EFF) and the Extended Credit Facility (ECF). A 
related
press release was issued separately.
 The economy is recovering after a sharp economic downturn 
in 2020 that was due to the COVID-19 pandemic and a drought. Real GDP growth is 
projected to rebound by 7.5 percent in 2021 driven by buoyant domestic demand, 
supported by robust credit and wage growth as well as strong remittance inflows. 
Inflation accelerated, driven by the recovery in demand and surging energy and 
food prices. The fiscal deficit is projected to reach 5 percent of GDP in 2021 
owing to higher crisis-related spending. Public debt has edged up to 34 percent 
of GDP and the external position has deteriorated due to rising global commodity 
prices and the pickup in domestic economic activity. The hard-earned progress in ensuring shareholder 
transparency, fit-and-proper ownership, and strong governance in Moldovan banks 
has boosted the resilience of the financial sector in the face of the ongoing 
crisis. Steps to safeguard the independence, financial autonomy, and strong 
governance of the National Bank of Moldova have promoted macro-financial 
stability, while recent improvements to financial integrity have helped 
safeguard the financial sector against illicit financial flows. Despite significant progress, broad governance and 
structural weaknesses continue to impede sustained improvement in the living 
standard of Moldovan citizens. Rule of law and anti-corruption frameworks remain 
weak. Public spending is inefficient and poorly targeted, with low-quality and 
inaccessible infrastructure. High emigration, particularly among the 
better-educated Moldovans, continues to hold back human capital accumulation. A 
weak business environment constrains private investment and productivity. Downside risks continue to beset the outlook. External 
risks include a more severe or protracted fallout from the global energy crisis, 
a weaker than anticipated global recovery, and spillovers from geopolitical 
tensions that could have negative spillovers for trade, capital, and remittance 
flows, and complicate prudent policymaking. Domestically, risks include new 
waves of COVID-19 infections and scarring of balance sheets from renewed 
unemployment and business closures. Moreover, a re-emergence of political 
instability, pushback from vested interests, or reform fatigue could hurt 
confidence, limit external financing options, and exacerbate the loss of 
professional expertise from key governmental bodies, further degrading Moldova’s 
already weak implementation capacity. Executive Board Assessment
 The Executive Directors welcomed the strong commitment of 
the new authorities to tackle long-standing governance vulnerabilities and 
leverage broad support from international partners to advance development 
objectives. Noting the challenging economic environment, precipitated by the 
2020 drought, the pandemic, and the energy crisis, Directors urged the 
authorities to build on the hard-won gains from the previous Fund arrangement 
and undertake the needed reforms to sustain the post-pandemic recovery, address 
pressing developmental needs, and strengthen Moldova’s governance and 
institutional frameworks. Directors agreed with the need for a sound policy mix to 
support the recovery and the development agenda, while ensuring fiscal and debt 
sustainability. They welcomed the new budget with targeted support on the 
healthcare system, social assistance programs, and business activity, as well as 
measures undertaken to address the energy crisis. Directors also stressed that 
the under-execution of approved Covid-related crisis measures emphasizes the 
need to address longstanding capacity constraints and called for continued CD 
support by international partners. As the recovery takes hold, efforts should focus at 
improving domestic revenue mobilization, increasing public spending efficiency, 
decisively addressing fiscal risks emanating from state-owned enterprises, and 
continuing efforts to improve budget quality and transparency. Such measures 
would be vital to ensure fiscal and debt sustainability and achieve the 
development agenda. Noting that the inflation targeting regime remains 
appropriate, Directors encouraged the National Bank of Moldova (NBM) to continue 
to act proactively to ensure inflation expectations are firmly anchored. They 
also emphasized the need to step up efforts to improve the NBM’s policy 
credibility and effectiveness, strengthen the monetary transmission mechanism, 
and continue promoting exchange rate flexibility to address Moldova’s 
vulnerability to external shocks. Directors also called for decisive actions to 
respond to significant vulnerabilities in the non-bank financial sector, 
strengthen the AML/CFT regime and follow up on the recommendations of the latest 
MONEYVAL report. Decisive progress on asset recovery is particularly important. Directors commended continued efforts by the authorities to 
strengthen the National Bank’s independence, governance, transparency, and 
accountability as well as the authorities’ plans to bolster the financial sector 
supervisory, financial crisis management, and macro-prudential frameworks in 
line with the recommendations in the 2021 Financial Sector Stability Review. Directors underscored that decisive program implementation 
of structural reforms to enhance governance and address longstanding and 
widespread institutional vulnerabilities remains critical. In addition to 
continued efforts to address weaknesses in fiscal and central bank governance 
and in financial sector oversight, Directors called for reforms in market 
regulation, especially in the energy sector, rule of law, and anti-corruption. 
Such measures would foster inclusive, private sector-led and sustainable growth 
and accelerate Moldova’s income convergence with its European peers.
 
Moldova: Selected Economic 
Indicators, 2017–2022 1/  
	
		|   | 
		2017 | 
		2018 |    
		2019        2020 | 2021 | 2022 |  
		|   |   |   | 
		  | 
		Prelim. actual | 
		Proj. |     Proj. |  
		|   | 
		
		(Percent change, unless otherwise indicated) |  
		| 
		
		Real sector indicators  | 
		
		  |   |   |   |   |   |  
		| 
		Gross domestic product  | 
		  |   |   |   |   |   |  
		| 
		Real growth rate | 
		
		4.7 | 
		
		4.3 | 
		
		3.7 | 
		
		-7.0 | 
		
		7.5 | 
		
		4.5 |  
		| 
		Demand | 
		5.9 | 
		6.0 | 
		3.7 | 
		-5.8 | 
		6.9 | 
		4.5 |  
		| 
		Consumption | 
		
		4.7 | 
		
		3.3 | 
		
		2.9 | 
		
		-5.9 | 
		
		6.5 | 
		
		4.0 |  
		| 
		   Private | 
		5.3 | 
		3.9 | 
		3.3 | 
		-6.8 | 
		7.1 | 
		4.4 |  
		| 
		   Public | 
		
		1.1 | 
		
		-0.2 | 
		
		0.5 | 
		
		-0.5 | 
		
		3.8 | 
		
		2.2 |  
		| 
		Gross fixed capitalformation
 | 
		8.0 | 
		14.5 | 
		11.9 | 
		-2.1 | 
		5.8 | 
		5.6 |  
		| 
		Net Exports of goods andservices
 | 
		
		-11.1 | 
		
		-13.0 | 
		
		-3.8 | 
		
		0.8 | 
		
		-4.2 | 
		
		-4.6 |  
		| 
		Exports of goods andservices
 | 
		10.9 | 
		7.2 | 
		8.2 | 
		-15.5 | 
		11.1 | 
		6.5 |  
		| 
		Imports of goods andservices
 | 
		
		11.0 | 
		
		9.7 | 
		
		6.2 | 
		
		-8.9 | 
		
		7.9 | 
		
		5.6 |  
		| 
		Nominal GDP (billions ofMoldovan 
		lei)
 | 
		178.9 | 
		192.5 | 
		210.4 | 
		206.4 | 
		232.5 | 
		255.6 |  
		| 
		Nominal GDP (billions of U.S.dollars)
 | 
		
		9.7 | 
		
		11.5 | 
		
		12.0 | 
		
		11.9 | 
		
		13.0 | 
		
		13.6 |  
		| 
		Consumer price index (average) | 
		6.5 | 
		3.6 | 
		4.8 | 
		3.8 | 
		4.0 | 
		6.2 |  
		| 
		Consumer price index (end ofperiod)
 | 
		
		7.3 | 
		
		0.9 | 
		
		7.5 | 
		
		0.4 | 
		
		7.9 | 
		
		5.0 |  
		| 
		GDP deflator | 
		6.2 | 
		3.2 | 
		5.4 | 
		5.4 | 
		4.8 | 
		5.2 |  
		| 
		Average monthly wage(Moldovan 
		lei)
 | 
		
		5695 | 
		
		6,443 | 
		
		7,356 | 
		
		8,104 | 
		
		8,619 | 
		
		9,328 |  
		| 
		Average monthly wage (U.S.dollars)
 | 
		308 | 
		383 | 
		419 | 
		468 | 
		483 | 
		496 |  
		| 
		Unemployment rate (annualaverage, percent)
 | 
		
		4.1 | 
		
		3.1 | 
		
		5.1 | 
		
		3.8 | 
		
		5.5 | 
		
		3.0 |  
		|   | 
		
		(Percent of GDP) |  
		| 
		
		Saving-investment balance |   |   |   |   |   |   |  
		| 
		Foreign saving | 
		5.7 | 
		10.6 | 
		9.3 | 
		7.5 | 
		11.3 | 
		10.2 |  
		| 
		National saving | 
		
		16.5 | 
		
		13.7 | 
		
		15.9 | 
		
		18.2 | 
		
		14.9 | 
		
		16.4 |  
		| 
		Private | 
		14.1 | 
		11.5 | 
		14.0 | 
		19.6 | 
		16.6 | 
		18.7 |  
		| 
		Public | 
		
		2.4 | 
		
		2.3 | 
		
		1.9 | 
		
		-1.4 | 
		
		-1.7 | 
		
		-2.3 |  
		| 
		Gross investment | 
		22.3 | 
		24.3 | 
		25.2 | 
		25.7 | 
		26.2 | 
		26.6 |  
		| 
		Private | 
		
		19.3 | 
		
		21.2 | 
		
		21.9 | 
		
		22.0 | 
		
		22.7 | 
		
		22.9 |  
		| 
		Public | 
		3.0 | 
		3.1 | 
		3.3 | 
		3.7 | 
		3.5 | 
		3.7 |  
	
		| 
		
		Fiscal indicators (general government) | 
		
		
		  | 
		
		
		  | 
		
		
		  | 
		
		
		  | 
		
		
		  | 
		
		
		  |  
		| 
		Primary balance | 
		
		0.5 | 
		
		-0.2 | 
		
		-0.8 | 
		
		-4.6 | 
		
		-4.5 | 
		
		-5.2 |  
		| 
		Overall balance | 
		-0.6 | 
		-0.8 | 
		-1.4 | 
		-5.1 | 
		-5.2 | 
		-6.0 |  
		| 
		Stock of public and publiclyguaranteed debt
 | 
		
		32.7 | 
		
		30.3 | 
		
		27.9 | 
		
		35.0 | 
		
		37.1 | 
		
		40.0 |  
		|   | 
		
		(Percent change, unless otherwise indicated) |  
		| 
		Financial indicators |   |   |   |   |   |   |  
		| 
		Broad money (M3)  | 
		9.4 | 
		7.8 | 
		8.2 | 
		19.6 | 
		15.6 | 
		9.3 |  
		| 
		Velocity (GDP/end-period M3;ratio)
 | 
		
		2.3 | 
		
		2.3 | 
		
		2.3 | 
		
		1.9 | 
		
		1.9 | 
		
		1.9 |  
		| 
		Reserve money | 
		11.2 | 
		17.7 | 
		7.6 | 
		18.8 | 
		9.8 | 
		9.3 |  
		| 
		Credit to the economy | 
		
		-3.4 | 
		
		4.1 | 
		
		11.5 | 
		
		10.3 | 
		
		15.0 | 
		
		10.0 |  
		| 
		Credit to the economy, percentof 
		GDP
 | 
		21.3 | 
		20.6 | 
		21.0 | 
		23.6 | 
		24.1 | 
		24.1 |  
		| 
		  | 
		
		(Millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)  |  
		| 
		External sector 
		indicators 2/ |   |   |   |   |   |   |  
		| 
		Current account balance | 
		
		-555 | 
		
		-1212 | 
		
		-1112 | 
		
		-893 | 
		-1469 | 
		
		-1384 |  
		| 
		Current account balance(percent 
		of GDP)
 | 
		-5.7 | 
		-10.6 | 
		-9.3 | 
		-7.5 | 
		-11.3 | 
		-10.2 |  
		| 
		Remittances and compensa-tion of 
		employees (net)
 | 
		
		1,494 | 
		
		1,669 | 
		
		1,729 | 
		
		1,669 | 
		
		1,893 | 
		
		2,006 |  
		| 
		Gross official reserves 3/ | 
		2,803 | 
		2,995 | 
		3,060 | 
		3,784 | 
		4,298 | 
		4,056 |  
		| 
		Gross official reserves (monthsof imports)
 | 
		
		5.3 | 
		
		5.4 | 
		
		6.2 | 
		
		6.1 | 
		
		6.5 | 
		
		5.8 |  
		| 
		Exchange rate (Moldovan leiper USD, period average)
 | 
		18.5 | 
		16.8 | 
		17.6 | 
		17.3 | 
		… | 
		… |  
		| 
		Exchange rate (Moldovan leiper USD, end of period)
 | 
		
		17.1 | 
		
		17.1 | 
		
		17.2 | 
		
		17.2 | 
		
		… | 
		
		… |  
		| 
		Real effective exchange rate(average, percent change)
 | 
		10.5 | 
		9.1 | 
		2.1 | 
		5.3 | 
		… | 
		… |  
		| 
		External debt (percent of GDP)4/
 | 
		
		70.4 | 
		
		65.5 | 
		
		62.7 | 
		
		64.8 | 
		
		63.7 | 
		
		63.8 |  
		| 
		Debt service (percent ofexports 
		of goods and services)
 | 
		12.6 | 
		14.7 | 
		13.4 | 
		15.8 | 
		12.2 | 
		11.4 |  
		| 
		
		Sources: Moldovan authorities; and IMF staff estimates. |  
		| 
		
		1/ Data exclude Transnistria.  |  
		| 
		
		 2/ Balance of Payments (BOP) classification is revised in line with the 
		Sixth Balance of Payments Manual. |  
		| 
		
		3/ Includes SDR allocation in 2021 (about US$236 million). |  
		| 
		
		4/ Includes private and public and publicly guaranteed debt.  |   
   
	IMF Communications 
	Department
 
	
	MEDIA RELATIONSPRESS OFFICER: Raphael Anspach
 Phone: +1 202 623-7100       
	Email:  MEDIA@IMF.org
  Source |